Legal Opinion

United States v. Louis Nakaladski, A/K/A Louis Nash, Ettore Coco, A/K/A Eddie Coco

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 8, 1973No. 72-3441PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

Appellants, Louis Nakaladski, a/k/a Louis Nash [hereinafter “Nash”], and Ettore Coco, a/k/a Eddie Coco [hereinafter “Coco”], were convicted of violating various anti-loan sharking provisions of Title II of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 891 et seq. Specifically, they were found guilty of: (1) conspiring to make and making extortionate extensions of credit in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 892; 1 (2) conspiring to participate and participating in the use of an extortionate means to collect an extension of credit in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894; 2 and (3)…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Vito Spillone, United States of America v. John Clyde Abel, United States of America v. Frank CitroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Terry Ray UptainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API