State v. Santiago
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
ABE, J.
This case presents a series of troublesome issues concerning the conduct of a criminal trial. In brief we are called upon to decide:
I. Whether in a criminal case the defendant’s credibility as a witness may be impeached by showing that he had previously been convicted of first degree burglary.
II. Whether custodial admissions made by the defendant, who had not been properly apprised of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), may be used to impeach the defendant when he takes the stand, even though the admissions could not be introduced as direct…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by237 opinions
- People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. BrisendineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. DisbrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. KalunaHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
232 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.