Davis v. Whidden
California Supreme Court
Mandamus from the Supreme Court to the Auditor of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as county auditor of the county of Alameda, to draw his warrants in payment of certain claims of work done by order of the board of supervisors of the county on June 1, 1897. The work was not done to prevent damage by storm waters or floods. The claims were duly presented to and allowed *619by the board of supervisors of the county and duly certified according to law, and were thereupon assigned to petitioner, who thereafter demanded of the auditor that he draw his warrants on the county treasurer in payment thereof.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louisville v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- People v. DobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People ex rel. Campbell v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by17 opinions
- French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- King v. Thierry S.California Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- DeJung v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Wilson v. Loew's Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.