Legal Opinion
Union Paving Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 6, 1953No. 48241PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to' recover $24,400, which it alleges was wrongfully and illegally assessed against it by the defendant as liquidated damages for its alleged delay in completing various portions of work within certain interim periods specified under a contract, whereby the plaintiff company constructed the piers and abutments for the Pit River Bridge in northern California, at the site of the Shasta Dam.
The erection of this bridge was part of a much larger project undertaken by the Bureau of Reclamation, Department of Interior, known as the Central Valley Project, in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
- Manufacturers Casualty Ins. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
- Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dynamics Corporation of America, as Successor in Interest to International Fermont, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Southwest Engineering Company, a Missouri Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Charles H. Blanchard, Jr., Doing Business as Blanchard Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- General Warehouse Two, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Universal Match Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.