Legal Opinion

Universal Match Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 5, 1963No. 554-59PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

This suit seeks $33,731.42 because of the termination by the defendant, for its own convenience, of a contract for the production of photoflash cartridges. Plaintiff, a St. Louis-based company, had a series of three agreements (Contracts 744, 850, 866) with the St. Louis Ordnance District of the Department of the Army to manufacture various types of these items. The only one of the contracts involved here is No. 866, entered into on June 30, 1954. It contained a standard termination-for-convenience article, obligating the defendant to pay, on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houston Ready-Cut House Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  2. Union Paving Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  3. Central Engineering & Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  4. Union Paving Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Chahroudi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dynamics Corporation of America, as Successor in Interest to International Fermont, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Macke Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  3. Albert J. Jansen, Doing Business as Mercury Service v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Missouri Baptist Hospital v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  5. The Franklin Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API