Legal Opinion
Karlin v. Foust
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 9, 1999No. Nos. 98-2043, 98-2262PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a number of facial constitutional challenges to Assembly Bill 441 (“AB 441”), which repealed and recreated Wisconsin’s abortion informed consent statute, Wis. Stat. § 253.10, to require physicians who perform abortions to meet with their patients at least twenty-four hours before the abortion procedure to provide the patients with specific oral and printed information. The district court found most of the provisions of AB 441 constitutional after severing certain provisions and construing others as not requiring physicians to provide certain information…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- PLANNED PARENT. MN, N. DAKOTA, S. DAKOTA v. RoundsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Okpalobi v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Cochran v. Illinois State Toll Highway AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- A Woman's Choice-East Side Women's Clinic v. Scott C. Newman, Prosecuting Attorney for Marion County Indiana, on Behalf of a Class of ProsecutorsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Spencer Tunick v. Howard Safir, in His Official Capacity as the Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.