Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1953No. 295PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPabKER, J.

It is well settled that a motion for tbe arrest of a judgment of tbe Superior Court in a criminal action tried in that court may be made in tbe Supreme Court. It is tbe duty of this Court to examine tbe whole record, and if it sees that tbe judgment should be arrested, it will ex mero motu direct that it be done. Tbe motion must be based upon matter appearing in tbe record, or upon an omission from tbe record of some matter which should appear therein. S. v. Baxter, 208 N.C. 90, 179 S.E. 450; S. v. Billiard, 223 N.C. 446, 27 S.E. 2d 85; S. v. McKeon, 223 N.C. 404, 26 S.E. 2d 914; S. v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. . DilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. . AngelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1846
  5. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. NugentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. DoughtieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API