Legal Opinion

Santa Fe, Prescott, & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Hurley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1894No. Civil No. 405PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a- judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. Owen T. Ronse, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.

The suit was commenced to recover damages for personal injuries. It is alleged, in substance, that the appellee was employed by appellant as a “brace” or “spud” holder about a certain pile-driver, at the time being used in the construction of appellant’s railroad, and that, while so employed, his hand and a portion of his arm were cut off through the negligence of appellant. The appellee recovered a judgment for thirteen thousand dollars damages against the corporation, and it appeals. There are numerous errors assigned, one of which we will now consider. The following portion of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Waldhier v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Woodward v. O. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Batterson v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Sharp v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. IrwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Southwest Cotton Co. v. PopeArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Albin v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. City of Phoenix v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API