Sharp v. Miller
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Fifteenth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Dwihelle, J • The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 2, Sharpstein, J.:
The plaintiff, after alleging in his complaint that he was, at all the times therein mentioned, the owner of certain specified *330real estate in the City and County of San Francisco, proceeds to state that on the 13th day of June, 1874, the defendant did maliciously procure one Charles L. Morris, then a non-resident of this State, and for the immediate benefit and profit of the defendant, to institute and prosecute a certain action in one of the District Courts against the plaintiff for the recovery of $51,000 and upward; that in said action defendant maliciously…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Taylor v. BidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Roy v. PosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- McCusker v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Stavropoulos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Santa Fe, Prescott, & Phœnix Railway Co. v. HurleyArizona Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.