Legal Opinion

Albin v. Seattle Electric Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1905No. 5606PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Hatch, J., entered Uovember 23, 1904, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a passenger alighting from a street car.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This action was instituted by respondents, John Albin and Anna Albin, husband and wife, against the Seattle Electric Company, to recover for personal injuries sustained by said Anna Albin. Appellant was operating a line of street cars between Ballard and the city of Seattle, and over Western avenue, in the latter city. Said Anna Albin boarded one of appellant’s cars, at a point known as Smith’s Cove, intending to alight at the intersection of Western avenue and Pike street. The specific acts of negligence charged in the complaint are alleged irü the following language:

“That on said 9th day of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Waldhier v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. BeggsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. FossIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Carter v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  5. Santa Fe, Prescott, & Phœnix Railway Co. v. HurleyArizona Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nelson v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Boyle v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. United States Express Co. v. WahlCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  4. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Ennis v. BanksWashington Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API