Legal Opinion

Tomei v. Ins. Co. of North America

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 27, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COBURN, J.S.C.

Plaintiff sued defendant Insurance Company of North America (INA) for personal injury protection benefits (PIP) under the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 et seq., commonly referred to as the “No-Fault Law.” Both parties demand summary judgment regarding liability. For the following reasons, I will grant plaintiff’s motion.

The facts are not in dispute. On February 28, 1982, plaintiff was injured when the motorcycle on which he was a passenger collided on a public road with an automobile insured by INA. Plaintiff did not own an automobile and was not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Amiano v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Hoglin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. McKenna v. WiskowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lane v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  2. Nunag v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API