Legal Opinion
Amiano v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 28, 1981PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
SULLIVAN, J.
This case presents the question whether the personal injury protection (PIP) endorsement, a mandatory part of every New Jersey automobile liability insurance policy under the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (No Fault Act), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 et seq., extends coverage to an insured who, while operating a commercial truck not covered by PIP, 1 is injured in an accident involving a passenger automobile. The trial court and the Appellate Division held that the insured was entitled to PIP coverage. These rulings adhered to a prior…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dacunzo v. EdgyeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Rybeck v. RybeckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Hoglin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Rybeck v. RybeckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- International Broth. of Elec. Workers v. GillenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Gambino v. Royal Globe Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Lindstrom v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Fisher v. New Jersey Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Michael A. Farrell and Jane L. Farrell, Appeal of Jane L. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. LacroixSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.