Legal Opinion

Nunag v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 17, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SHEBELL, J.A.D.

Defendant Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (Company) appeals from an order of the Law Division requiring it to pay personal injury protection (PIP) benefits related to injuries sustained by plaintiff Nicole Nunag while she *755was on a moped which was involved in a collision with an automobile.

Plaintiff, a member of her mother’s household, sought PIP benefits on the premise that she was a pedestrian, under a standard automobile policy issued to her mother which covered her mother’s car. Defendant denied that plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. McKenna v. WiskowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  3. Pekter v. PriceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Lane v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Tomei v. Ins. Co. of North AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. David Goyco v. Progressive Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2024
  2. Sprague v. Niagara Fire InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API