Legal Opinion

Lane v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 25, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs, William E. Lane, an Infant by his Guardian Ad Litem, Rembert Lane, and Rembert Lane, Individually, appeal from a judgment of the Law Division in favor of defendant Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company. Plaintiffs sought reimbursement under the Basic Personal Injury Protection Endorsement (PIP) provisions of an automobile policy issued to Willie Barr (Barr), the owner and operator of a passenger vehicle with which the infant plaintiff collided while riding his minibike. Plaintiff claimed entitlement to PIP…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leimgruber v. Claridge Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Hoglin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Harlan v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. McKenna v. WiskowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  5. Government Employees Ins. Co. v. DanielsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nunag v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  2. David Goyco v. Progressive Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API