Legal Opinion

Fraser v. Regents of University of California

California Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1952No. S. F. 18428PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Petitioner brought this original proceeding in mandamus to compel respondents to reinstate him to the position of instructor at the University of California and to pay him compensation in accordance with the terms of his contract of employment. Respondents’ return to the alternative writ was by demurrer and answer. Inasmuch as we have concluded that the demurrer must be sustained, it is unnecessary to give any consideration to the issues of fact raised by the answer.

Petitioner alleges that he was discharged from his position as instructor because of his failure to execute the oath required by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tolman v. UnderhillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Pockman v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Bowen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tolman v. UnderhillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Newmarker v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Hirschman v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Bowen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Board of Education v. WilkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API