Legal Opinion

Hirschman v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1952No. L. A. 22035PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiffs, permanent civil service employees of the county of Los Angeles, were discharged because they refused to execute the oath and affidavits prescribed by orders of the county board of supervisors made in 1947 and 1948.* The county civil service commission sustained the discharges after a hearing upon stipulated facts, and plaintiffs sought a writ of mandate in the superior court to compel their reinstatement and the payment of wages retroactive to the date of discharge. This appeal was taken from the judgment denying the requested relief.

The oath and affidavits are as follows:

“A. Oath…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Pockman v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Steiner v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Bowen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Fraser v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Vogel v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Syrek v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Steinmetz v. California State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In Re CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. First Unitarian Church v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API