Legal Opinion

Bowen v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1952No. L. A. 22012PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Petitioner, a Los Angeles County civil service employee, was discharged because she refused to sign the oath required of all public employees by the Levering Act (Gov. Code, §§ 3100-3109), and she has brought this original proceeding in mandamus seeking reinstatement and payment of compensation which was withheld following her suspension.

Before the Levering Act went into effect, petitioner executed an oath almost identical with that prescribed in section 3 of article XX of the state Constitution, and she also took the oath and made the affidavits required by the hoard of supervisors of Los…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tolman v. UnderhillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Pockman v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hirschman v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Fraser v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hirschman v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Fraser v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. In Re FarrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API