Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1978No. 10069PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Walter Lewis Schmidt was charged with the crime of indecent or obscene exposure in violation of NRS 201.220, a felony as defined by NRS 201.220(l)(b). His initial plea of not guilty was withdrawn in order to avoid an amended information charging habitual criminality. After entering a plea of nolo contendere, Schmidt was adjudged guilty of the crime alleged and was sentenced to a term of six years in the Nevada State Prison.

Reversal of this judgment and sentence is now urged upon due process and cruel and unusual punishment principles. Nonetheless, for reasons stated below, we conclude…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Warden, Nevada State Prison v. LyonsNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hargrove v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Houk v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Deveroux v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Sheriff, Clark County v. LuqmanNevada Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API