Legal Opinion
Joseph v. Fratar
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 30, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-30263-MAPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES (Docket No. 18)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(c)(2), F. Michael Joseph (“Plaintiff’) seeks an award of attorney’s fees and expenses incurred in proving the truth of certain matters denied in Courtney Fratar (“Defendant”)’s responses to requests for admission. Rule 37(c)(2) provides as follows:
If a party fails to admit the genuineness of any document or the truth of any matter as requested under Rule 36, and if the party requesting the admissions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cooper v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Chemical Engineering Corporation and John O. McLean v. Essef Industries, Inc. And Willard StutzmanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Russo v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
- Scheufler v. General Host Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- A & V Fishing, Inc. v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- HP Tuners, LLC v. CannataDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- HP Tuners, LLC v. CannataDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- WRB, Inc. v. DAMM, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- ZABLOTNEY v. WINDBER HOSPITAL, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024