Russo v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LAGUEUX, Chief Judge.
Ronald Russo (“Russo”) was an unsuccessful litigant. Now, this Court must decide if he was a culpable one as well.
Russo invented a new type of medical catheter, and he brought this suit because he thought Baxter Healthcare Corporation (“Baxter”) had interfered with his ownership. In brief, he thought Baxter had publicized the invention without his permission, thus destroying his right to foreign patents. His complaint alleged that Baxter had violated his rights under the Rhode Island Uniform Trade Secrets Act, had interfered with his prospective business…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kevin F. Marchand v. Mercy Medical Center, an Idaho Corporation, and Neil K. Farris, D.O.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Alfred Lancellotti v. Honorable Thomas F. Fay, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Servicios Comerciales Andinos, S.A. v. General Electric Del Caribe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Edward Albert Gioiosa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Benson Tower Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Victaulic Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- House v. Giant of Maryland, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Krafft v. DowneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Joseph v. FratarDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. American Guarantee and Liability Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.