A & V Fishing, Inc. v. Home Insurance
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RULE .
11 SANCTIONS (# 6)
COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions (# 6) requires that the Court examine the relationship between Rules 11 and Rule 37(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., in the circumstance in which a party is served with requests for admission of facts and denies the same even though there is substantial evidence that the facts are true and the responding party knows that they are true.
F/Y JOSEPHINE MARIE was owned by the A & V Fishing, Inc. (hereinafter, “A & V”); the vessel sank off the north coast of Cape…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Joseph v. FratarDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- HP Tuners, LLC v. CannataDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- Lively v. ReedDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Nnodim v. US Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
- Watkins v. Lincare Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.