Legal Opinion

United States v. L. C. Bagby, United States of America v. Carl Strong

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 15, 1971No. 71-1577, 71-1578PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

Bagby and Strong appeal from judgments of conviction entered upon guilty verdicts under an indictment charging a conspiracy made criminal by 21 U.S.C. § 174. We reverse and remand.

Section 174 proscribes a conspiracy to commit any of the acts that it makes criminal. In this case the charge is that one Brazil, Bagby, Strong, and one Thurman (an unindicted conspirator) conspired “to receive, conceal, buy, sell, and facilitate the transportation and concealment of quantities of unlawfully imported heroin, a narcotic drug, knowing the said heroin to have been imported into…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward TerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Albert EscalanteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. State v. EnglandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. United States v. James J. PazsintCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Larry Darnell Westbrook, Wayne Allen Bledsoe, Jr., Michael Lynn Peoples, and A.J. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API