Legal Opinion
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 26, 1986No. 84-1350PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Associate Judge:
Atlantic Richfield (ARCO) petitions for review of the District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights’ (Commission) decision that ARCO discriminated against Elisa S. Janetis, a former employee, on the basis of her personal appearance in violation of the D.C. Human Rights Act. D.C.Code § 1-2501 et seq. (1981). The Commission also found that ARCO constructively discharged Janetis and awarded her $22,200 for backpay, compensatory damages and costs. ARCO argues that: (1) the amendment of Janetis’ complaint to include constructive discharge was untimely; (2) the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Arthur Young & Co. v. SutherlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Beebe v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Daka, Inc. v. BreinerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Estenos v. PAHO/WHO Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.