Legal Opinion
Bijeol v. Benson
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided October 31, 1975No. TH 75-24-CPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOLAND, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM ENTRY
The plaintiffs are presently or were formerly prisoners at the United States Penitentiary at Terre Haute, Indiana, and have filed this' action purportedly as a “class” pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking damages and declaratory and injunctive relief. The plaintiffs contend that certain policies and practices of the officials at the United States Bureau of Prisons and the United States Penitentiary at Terre Haute, Indiana, have deprived, and will continue to deprive, the plaintiffs of their constitutional rights. In the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Laaman v. HelgemoeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1977
- United States Ex Rel. Wolfish v. LeviDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Samuel J.M. Davis, Jr. v. P.W. Keohane, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.