Bell v. Wolfish
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
441 U.S. 520 (1979)
BELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
v.
WOLFISH ET AL.
No. 77-1829.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 16, 1979.
Decided May 14, 1979.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
Deputy Solicitor General Frey argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General McCree, Assistant Attorney General Heymann, Kent L. Jones, and Sidney M. Glazer.
Phylis Skloot Bamberger argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were William E. Hellerstein, David J. Gottlieb, and Michael B. Mushlin.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · RehnquistJustice Rehnquist
Over the past five Terms, this…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent · Marshall; Dissent · Stevens.
3Cases cited136 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by37 opinions
- Jonathon Castro v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Scalia v. Cnty. of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- United States v. Mark FowlkesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Jonathon Castro v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Rene Sanchez-GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.