Legal Opinion

Federal Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 8372PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

The petitioner herein applies for a writ of review whereby it seeks to have a decision and award of the Industrial Accident Commission reviewed and annulled. The petitioner was and is the insurer of Stephens-Adamson Mfg. Company of Los Angeles, which was, at the time of his death, the employer of one Carl C. Nagel, whose daughter Charlotte C. Nagel, a minor, was the applicant for and was granted the award. The facts out of which the present application arose are practically undisputed and are these: Carl C. Nagel and his wife Nanette Nagel, who had been married in 1907, were living in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Pacific Gold Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Fernandez v. AburreaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Matter of McMullinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Svoboda v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dixon v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. County of Alameda v. KaiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Barrett v. BarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. County of Alameda v. EspinozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Southern California Edison Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API