Matter of McMullin
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Sheriff of Sonoma County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully imprisoned by the sheriff of the county of Sonoma by reason of an order of a committing magistrate holding him to answer for trial in the superior court for an alleged violation of section 270 of the Penal Code, in failing to furnish his minor child, Juanita McMullin, with necessary food, clothing, shelter, and medical attendance. It appears from the evidence taken at the preliminary examination that petitioner and Emma H. McMullin were husband and wife and the parents of Juanita; that Emma H. McMullin went to the state of Nevada, taking with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- First National Bank v. EastmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. SchlottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Addy v. AddySupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Pacific Gold Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Calhoun v. CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- In Re CarboniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.