Southern California Edison Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
It appears that some time during the year-1917, in the state of Idaho, one Claude S. McKendrick, who at that time was a resident of this state, was divorced by his wife. By the decree of divorce the custody of Daniel McKendrick, a minor son of the parties, was awarded to the mother, although no provision for alimony to her, nor support by the father for the son, was contained in the decree. A few months after the decree of divorce was granted the mother of the boy was married to a man named Rodgers. On June 23, 1923, in the course of his industrial employment, the father of the boy met with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pacific Gold Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Federal Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Svoboda v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Llewellyn Iron Works v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Robert Sherer & Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Baratti v. BarattiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Rosher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Dixon v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Barrett v. BarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.