Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1928No. Docket No. 5934PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

It appears that some time during the year-1917, in the state of Idaho, one Claude S. McKendrick, who at that time was a resident of this state, was divorced by his wife. By the decree of divorce the custody of Daniel McKendrick, a minor son of the parties, was awarded to the mother, although no provision for alimony to her, nor support by the father for the son, was contained in the decree. A few months after the decree of divorce was granted the mother of the boy was married to a man named Rodgers. On June 23, 1923, in the course of his industrial employment, the father of the boy met with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pacific Gold Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Federal Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Svoboda v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Llewellyn Iron Works v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Robert Sherer & Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Baratti v. BarattiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Rosher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Dixon v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Barrett v. BarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API