Sulkowski v. Schaefer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Fairchild, J.(1) Suggested negligence of plaintiff. It is undisputed that although Barbara made some general observations as to the street they were on, the approximate speed of the car, and the like, she was not “paying any particular attention to the road” and that she did not see the parked car before they struck it. Defendants contend this was evidence from which the jury could find her negligent as to lookout, and further suggest she may have been “distracting” Robert as he drove.
Robert (aged twenty-one) and Barbara (aged twenty) had spent the evening together, beginning at about 7:30.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jewell v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Seifert v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Baker v. Herman Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Vandenack v. CrosbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Lewis v. LeitermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Seitz v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Delmore v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Hoeft v. FriedelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Gustin v. JohannesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Duane Fagnan and Raymond Fagnan v. Great Central Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.