Legal Opinion

Cullen v. Pearson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 2, 1934No. Nos. 29,797, 29,798PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 253 N.W. 117, 254 N.W. 631. Two actions, tried together, for personal injuries arising out of an accident. Defendant owned and was driving a White truck on a public highway. The two plaintiffs had been assisting the defendant in temporary road work on his premises and were riding with him in the truck, returning from such work. The truck suddenly ran off the highway into the adjoining road ditch and overturned, and the two plaintiffs were injured. The defendant appeals in each case from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff therein. There was a motion in each case for judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heffter v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Grotenrath v. GrotenrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Bowers v. SchulerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Young v. LindquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. West Fargo Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Tanski v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. In Re Application for Discipline of Eugene A. ReratSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. McKeown v. ArgetsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Segal v. Bloom Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API