Grotenrath v. Grotenrath
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The appellants first contend that’ since the widow of Fred Grotenrath is still living and no distribution of the estate may presently be made, the petition for construction was prematurely made, and therefore the court should have declined to construe the will.
*384It is generally held that courts will not ordinarily construe provisions of a will where no present payments of income are to be made, or where the time has not arrived for distribution of the principal (In re Klumpf's Estate, 95 Misc. 436, 158 N. Y. Supp. 1094) ; that courts will not ordinarily render advisory opinions where the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Patton v. LudingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Korn v. FrizWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Thatcher v. FouksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Williams v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Will of OwensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bresnehan v. BresnehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Johnson v. West Fargo Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. Brian GrandberryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Tanski v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- In Re Application for Discipline of Eugene A. ReratSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.