Legal Opinion

Young v. Lindquist

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1914No. Nos. 18,601—(142)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to set aside a judgment against plaintiff and recover $734 from defendant Lindquist and plaintiff’s expenses in defending his claim for lien, and to recover $205 from defendant Bruce Edgerton Lumber Có.. From orders, Steele, J., striking out certain portions of the complaint, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

The defendant Lindquist brought an action against this plaintiff to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Defendant Bruce Edgerton Lumber Co., another lien claimant, intervened. After a regular trial, judgment was ordered for both claimants, and an order denying a new trial was affirmed in this court (119 Minn. 219, 138 N. W. 28). Judgment was thereupon entered in the district court. This action is brought to set aside this judgment on the ground of fraud. Each defendant moved to strike out certain portions of the complaint as irrelevant or redundant, and also moved for an order to make certain other…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hass v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Bomsta v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Lindquist v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Colby v. ColbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Moudry v. WitzkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Tankar Gas, Inc. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Cullen v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Betcher v. Midland National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Miller v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API