Legal Opinion
Hydramar, Inc. v. General Dynamics Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 9, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 85-1788PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HANNUM, Senior District Judge.
The matter presently before the Court arises out of Hydramar, Inc.’s motion to compel discovery from defendant, General Dynamics Corporation. This motion was addressed previously by this Court in a Memorandum and Order issued on September 22, 1986. See Hydramar, Inc. v. General Dynamics Corporation, 115 F.R.D. 147 (E.D.Pa.1986).
In its Memorandum and Order, this Court acknowledged that plaintiff sought information bearing “on how General Dynamics handled plaintiff’s January 21, 1983 claim to adjust equitably the contract price.” Information of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Energy Mgt. P 26,389 Conoco Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. United States Department of Justice. Conoco Inc. v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Bird v. Penn Central Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Shapiro v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Christus Spohn Hospital KlebergTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. United Hospital Center, Inc. v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
- Peralta v. Cendant Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Schreib v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.