Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. Allstate Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 41985PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FULLAM, District Judge.

The use-plaintiff, Anthony Laurelli, recovered a verdict in a tort action against William Shapiro in an amount greatly in excess of the liability insurance coverage provided Shapiro by the defendant Allstate Insurance Company. Claiming that the insurance company acted in bad faith in handling the case, Laurelli obtained an assignment of the policy-holder’s rights1 and has brought the present action to recover the unpaid portion of the verdict, i. e., the excess over the amount paid under the policy.

Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Alex N. Bell v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re International Systems And Controls Corporation Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. George and Betty Lorenz, Cross-Appellants v. Valley Forge Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Dumas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  5. Bird v. Penn Central Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API