Tate v. LeMaster
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Legge, Justice.
In an action to recover the sum of five hundred ($500.00) dollars paid by the plaintiff to the defendant in a transaction relating to the purchase and sale of real estate, plaintiff obtained a verdict for that amount, with interest; and the defendant appeals.
Except for (1) respondent’s check evidencing the payment, and (2) appellant’s receipt therefor, the transaction between the parties was verbal; and the evidence as to its terms was, to say the least, conflicting. It appears undisputed that appellant owned and resided on a tract of some twenty-three acres in Spartanburg…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pembroke v. CaudillSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
- Buren v. Digges Ex Rel. LibbeySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Evans v. MoseleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Brown v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Dill v. Lumbermen's Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. HollmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- Benya v. GambleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Johnson Ex Rel. Herrington v. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- Nelson v. Coleman Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.