Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Midlands Human Resources Center

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 31, 1988No. 1234PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is an action for breach of contract. The circuit court entered a default against the defendants after they failed to answer the complaint. The court then conducted the separate damages hearing required by Howard v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 271 S. C. 238, 246 S. E. (2d) 880 (1978). At the conclusion of the hearing, the court entered judgment for plaintiffs, Bruce and Ethel Jackson, in the sum of $39,650.00. The defendants Midlands Human Resources Center, Sam Washington, Edna Horton, and Sarah Patterson appeal. We reverse and remand.

This lawsuit has its origins in a miscarried…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Renney v. Dobbs House, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Howard v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Benya v. GambleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Kline Iron & Steel Co. v. Superior Trucking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  5. Piggy Park Enterprises, Inc. v. SchofieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. South Carolina Federal Savings Bank v. Thornton-Crosby Development Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Cheuk Wai Chan v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Two Trees v. Builders Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Solley v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Limehouse v. HulseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API