Legal Opinion

Sheek v. Lee

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 16, 1986No. 22576PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Chief Justice:

Appellants Lee (buyers) appeal an order of the master which awarded respondents Sheek (sellers) damages for the buyers’ failure to close a real estate transaction. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The buyers contracted to purchase the sellers’ home and deposited $2,000 as earnest money. When the buyers failed to consummate the sale, the sellers retained the earnest money and brought suit for breach of contract. The master awarded the sellers damages of $7,189.53. The buyers directly appealed to this Court.

Buyers assert error in the master’s finding that the damages…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benya v. GambleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Bannon v. KnaussCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Hobbs v. Carolina Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Carolina Life Ins. Co. v. Bank of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  5. Crozier v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hackworth v. Greywood at Hammett, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Callum v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
  3. Allegro, Inc. v. ScullySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  4. Bell v. BennettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Connor Holdings, LLC v. CousinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API