Kulstad v. Maniaci
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Barbara Maniaci appeals from the order of the District Court adopting a Final Parenting Plan, which granted sole custody of L.M. and A.M., minor children, to Appellee Michelle Kulstad. She also challenges the imposition of a protective order restricting the parties’ access to the children’s therapy notes and products. We affirm the Final Parenting Plan and vacate the District Court’s determination that §40-4-225, MCA, is unconstitutional.
¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:
¶3 1. Did the District Court err by adopting a Final Parenting Plan granting residential custody of the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Day v. PayneMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. WestMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re the Marriage of MeeksMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Kulstad v. ManiaciMontana Supreme Court · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of FunkMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. PetersMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Ternes v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
- Horn v. Bull River Country Store Properties, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Raul Sanchez v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.