Legal Opinion

Kulstad v. Maniaci

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2010No. DA 10-0205PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Barbara Maniaci appeals from the order of the District Court adopting a Final Parenting Plan, which granted sole custody of L.M. and A.M., minor children, to Appellee Michelle Kulstad. She also challenges the imposition of a protective order restricting the parties’ access to the children’s therapy notes and products. We affirm the Final Parenting Plan and vacate the District Court’s determination that §40-4-225, MCA, is unconstitutional.

¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err by adopting a Final Parenting Plan granting residential custody of the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Day v. PayneMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. WestMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In Re the Marriage of MeeksMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Kulstad v. ManiaciMontana Supreme Court · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of FunkMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. PetersMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Ternes v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Horn v. Bull River Country Store Properties, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Raul Sanchez v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API