Legal Opinion

Kulstad v. Maniaci

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 2009No. DA 08-0483PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 Far too often this Court faces a situation in which minor children *515have no adult fit to parent them. See e.g. In re E.D., 2008 MT 216, 344 Mont. 228, 186 P.3d 1283; In re M.P., 2008 MT 39, 341 Mont. 333, 177 P.3d 495; In re Custody and Parental Rights of A.P., 2007 MT 297, 340 Mont. 39, 172 P.3d 105. This case presents the increasingly unusual situation of two adults fit to parent minor children, L.M. and A.M. The District Court awarded a parental interest in the minor children to Appellee Michelle Kulstad (Kulstad) over the objection of the Appellant Barbara L. Maniaci (Maniaci). The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Matter of Guardianship of DoneyMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Soohoo v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Rubano v. DiCenzoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. In Re the Estate of BradshawMontana Supreme Court · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Smith v. GuestSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  2. In re the Parenting of N.S.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In re C.J.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. S.Y. v. S.B.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Kulstad v. ManiaciMontana Supreme Court · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API