Legal Opinion

Horn v. Bull River Country Store Properties, LLC

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2012No. DA 12-0017PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 After a five-day trial in October 2011, a Sanders County jury decided that Appellee Bull River Country Store Properties, LLC, (Bull River) was not negligent in connection with the plaintiffs’ claim that it sold water-contaminated diesel fuel. Appellants Pete and Elva Horn (Horn) appeal the Twentieth Judicial District Court’s order denying their motion for a new trial. We affirm.

¶2 We restate the issues as follows:

¶3 1. Is Horn entitled to a new trial because Bull River’s reliance on the settled-party defense authorized by § 27-1-703, MCA, violated his due process rights?

¶4 2. Did the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Seltzer v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Plumb v. Fourth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. StockMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In re A.A.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Baxter v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Newman v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Weaver v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Murray v. WhitcraftMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Commissioner of Political Practices for the State Ex Rel. Mangan v. WittichMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Covey v. BrishkaMontana Supreme Court · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API