Legal Opinion
State v. Peters
Montana Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 2011No. DA 10-0375, DA 10-0521, DA 10-0522, DA 10-0523, DA 10-0525, DA 10-0526PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wheat
¶1 In this case, we consider the consolidated appeals of Damon Franklin Peters (Peters), Matthew Boyd Banks, Kirk Buis, Connie Christofferson, Vicki Brandt Fitzgerald, and Jarrett Lee Super (collectively “Appellants”), for the purpose of resolving two issues common to each of their cases. Each Appellant sought the source code and information about the use of the Intoxilyzer 8000 in their respective DUI cases. The First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, limited the requests of each defendant. From those orders, each appeals. We affirm.
¶2 This case also involves an issue unique…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. PrattMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Montana Power Co. v. Montana Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. LaceyMontana Supreme Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Raul Sanchez v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MaileMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BergmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. J. FosterMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BergmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.