Legal Opinion
Rose v. Beasley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 11, 1997No. 24667PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal is from an order of the circuit court holding void the suspension of B. Boykin Rose from his office as Director of the Department of Public Safety (DPS) and affirming his removal from that office. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts leading to Rose’s suspension and removal involve the administration of federal grant programs by DPS. The DPS Office of Safety and Grants receives grant applications which are initially reviewed by the DPS staff and approved by the Director of DPS. The Director then forwards these recommendations to a contact person at the Governor’s Office. The contact person…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Thomas L. Glenn v. J. Gardner Newman, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- McDowell v. BurnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- State Ex Rel. Lyon v. RhameSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Lackey v. Green Tree Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Harvey v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Gardner v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Eargle v. Horry CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.