Legal Opinion

Gardner v. South Carolina Department of Revenue

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 27, 2003No. 25587PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

This appeal concerns the 1995 Setoff Debt Collection Act (1995 Act) 1 and 1999 amendments 2 thereto. The 1995 Act permits a “claimant agency” to seize the South Carolina income tax refund of a taxpayer who has a delinquent debt with the claimant agency. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

Plaintiffs/Respondents (Plaintiffs) brought this declaratory judgment action against Defendants/Appellants (Defendants) asserting Defendants, as claimant agencies, improperly seized their income tax refunds. Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief, the return of their seized tax refunds, and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Stott v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  3. Richard Kline v. Coldwell, Banker & Co., RealtorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. In Re the Treatment & Care of LuckabaughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pope v. Heritage Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Grazia v. South Carolina State Plastering, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. BLH v. S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  4. Aiken v. SCDORSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
  5. Calvin Henson v. SCDCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API