Legal Opinion

McKenna v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 13, 2012No. Case No. CV F 12-0849 LJO GSAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON KAISER DEFENDANTS’ F.R.Civ.P. 12 MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED CLAIMS (Doc. 16.)

LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (“Kaiser”) and defendant Mi*1264ehelle Hanrahan (“Ms. Hanrahan”), a Kaiser supervisor, seek to dismiss as improperly pled and legally barred plaintiff Elizabeth McKenna’s (“Ms. McKenna’s”) claims arising from her employment with and termination by Kaiser. Ms. McKenna appears to contend that her claims are adequately pled to avoid F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal. This Court considered Kaiser and Ms. Hanrahan’s (collectively…

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Adams & Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. Bowman v. Adams & Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. Elias v. Wynn Las Vegas LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
  4. Lopez-Rodriguez v. Kern Medical Surgery Center, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. Samantha Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API