Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Adams & Associates, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 6, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00472Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEE BOWMAN, No. 2:18-cv-00472-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ADAMS & ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Adams & Associate, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) 18 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff Lee Bowman (“Plaintiff”) filed an 19 opposition. (ECF No. 9.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 10.) For the reasons set forth 20 below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion with leave to amend. 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 ///…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API