Samantha Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMANTHA WILLIAMS, No. 23-cv-02585-DC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S 14 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., MOTION TO DISMISS 15 Defendant. (Doc. No. 32) 16 17 This matter is before the court on Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.’s (“UPS”) motion 18 to dismiss. (Doc. No. 32.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending motion was taken under 19 submission to be decided on the papers. (Doc. No. 35.) For the reasons explained below, the court 20 will grant in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.