Legal Opinion
Romero-Vargas v. Shalala
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 12, 1995No. 3:94 CV 7667PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. Because Plaintiffs have shown that no material issue of fact exists and that they are- entitled to judgment as a matter of law, Plaintiffs’ motion will be granted. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs brought' this action under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, alleging that a Social Security Administration (“SSA”) employee improperly disclosed confidential information from the Social Security records of approximately sixty Hispanic…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beaven v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Jacobs v. National Drug Intelligence CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Schmidt v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- Wiley v. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Aaron L. Lewis, III v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.