Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 30, 2003No. 00-C-1093PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STADTMUELLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Albert Schmidt and Sandy Bond filed this class action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated alleging the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) violated their rights under Section 552a of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, as amended, by unlawfully disclosing the social security numbers (“SSNs”) of its employees.
Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment pursuant Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. *623The plaintiffs’ motion seeks a judgment from the court that the VA violated Section 7 of the Privacy Act as well as…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Luster v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- In Re: Science Applications International Corp. (Saic) Backup Tape Data Theft LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Wrocklage v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Authority of the Chairman of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board to Disclose Performance Appraisals of Senior Executive Service Employees, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2015
- Disclosure of Employee Appraisals to a Member of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.