Legal Opinion

Kline v. Hanover Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1985No. C5-84-2061PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

The trial court held that an insurance policy issued to H & R Block, Inc. covers a car owned by respondents John B. Kline and Betty Kline. The trial court also granted Kline’s “supplemental relief” motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 6, 1980, John Kline ran a stop sign with his 1973 Dodge and collided with a vehicle owned by respondent Dahlen Transport, Inc. and driven by respondent Roger Rauchman. The Dodge was registered under the name of Betty Kline and was purchased through the Klines’ joint checking account.

At the time of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Motor Vehicle Casualty Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Diocese of Winona v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. Seaway Port Authority of Duluth v. Midland Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Wondra v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Weber v. Sentry InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API