Legal Opinion

Riss & Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided July 18, 1952No. Civ. A. 7694PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Riss and Company, Inc. is an extensive motor carrier operating under various certificates bearing the general Commission docket number designation of MC-200. Among such certificates is MC-200 (Sub-No. 60TA), which is a temporary certificate to transport “Dangerous Explosives, * * * ”. A number of railroads filed (February 27, 1952), with the Commission, a “Petition for Issuance of a Cease and Desist Order” against Riss to cease and desist from operating “beyond the scope of the territory authorized in Sub 60TA * * * ” and “ * * to confine its operations under Sub 60TA to the routes and points…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allied Van Lines Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
  2. Riss & Company v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
  3. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Dance Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1957
  5. Greyhound Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API